From 254efb5372879125841feae5d916a0118ea0f473 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Szucs Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 11:41:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a typo (#14953) Signed-off-by: Robert Szucs --- bundles/org.openhab.binding.mqtt.generic/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bundles/org.openhab.binding.mqtt.generic/README.md b/bundles/org.openhab.binding.mqtt.generic/README.md index 92416d593b..7601509caa 100644 --- a/bundles/org.openhab.binding.mqtt.generic/README.md +++ b/bundles/org.openhab.binding.mqtt.generic/README.md @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ be found on "device123/brightness". In openHAB we call that a **state topic**. This pattern is very common, that you have a command and a state topic. A sensor would only have a state topic, naturally. -Because every manufacturer can device on his own on which topic his devices publish, this +Because every manufacturer can decide on his own on which topic his devices publish, this binding can unfortunately not provide any auto-discovery means. If you use an open source IoT device, the chances are high, -- 2.47.3